Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Harrow

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided January 31, 2006No. ACM 35257PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

STONE, Senior Judge:

A panel of officer and enlisted members convicted the appellant, contrary to her pleas, of the unpremeditated murder of her daughter, in violation of Article 118, UCMJ; 10 U.S.C. § 918. She pled guilty to 13 additional offenses, to include: multiple failures to go, absence without leave, making a false official statement, theft of insurance proceeds, fraud in obtaining phone services, dishonorable failure to pay just debts, and making false claims to secure the approval of a loan. These offenses violated Articles 86, 107, 121, and 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  5. United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrowCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  2. United States v. Staff Sergeant DANIEL GASKINSArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2010
  3. United States v. AllenUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
  4. United States v. CherryUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
  5. United States v. HarrowCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API