Legal Opinion

Brooker v. Riester

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 20, 1947No. 5297PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, Judge

This appeal is in an interference proceeding from a decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarding priority of the subject matter of invention of 5 counts to the joint appellees.

The counts read as follows:

Count 1: A dyestuff having the following general formula:

wherein A and

B stand for an atom grouping capable of completing an organic ring system,

Y stands for the member of the group consisting of O, S, Se, and — CH=CH — ,

Rx is alkyl,

E2 is a member selected from the class consisting of alkyl and aryl,

X is an anion and n is a whole number smaller…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Farrington v. MikeskaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Joshua C. Conner v. George G. JorisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  2. Vandenberg v. ReynoldsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  3. Young v. BullittCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  4. Young Et Al. v. Orville H. Bullitt, Jr.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API