Legal Opinion

McMaster v. State of Minn.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1993No. Civ. 4-92-1058PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion for dismissal and partial summary judgment. The motion will be granted.

FACTS

This is a class action brought by current and former inmates of various Minnesota correctional facilities. Defendants include the state of Minnesota, the Commissioner of the Department of Corrections (DOC), and various state officials involved with prison industries operated by the DOC. The prison industries were established pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 241.27, which allows the DOC to establish industrial and commercial…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. McMaster v. MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  2. Smith v. BabbittDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
  3. Adkins v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Hadix v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
  5. Mcmaster v. State Of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API