Legal Opinion
Hadix v. Johnson
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 1, 1996No. 80-73581PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FEIKENS, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Issues
Defendants move to terminate relief ordered by a consent decree entered into and approved by me in 1985. Numerous remedial orders were triggered by the mandates of the consent decree. References to these matters are recorded in Hadix cases: 694 F.Supp. 259 (E.D.Mich.1988), 712 F.Supp. 550 (E.D.Mich.1989), 740 F.Supp. 433 (E.D.Mich.1990), 792 F.Supp. 527 (E.D.Mich.1992), and 896 F.Supp. 697 (E.D.Mich.1995).
Defendants’ motion is based on the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA” or “the Act”), effective as of April 26, 1996. The…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- James Benjamin v. Michael Jacobson, Commissioner of the Department of Correction of the City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Hadix v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Everett Hadix v. Perry M. Johnson, (96-2463), United States of America, Intervenor-Appellant (96-2582)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Everett Hadix, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Perry M. Johnson,defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Ruiz v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.