Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. King

California Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1967No. Crim. 10693PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Defendants Andrew Hart and Thomas King were charged in an indictment with conspiracy to commit grand theft (Pen. Code, § 182) and in each of two additional counts with grand theft (Pen. Code, §§ 484, 487). Their motion to set aside the indictment was granted, and the People appeal.

The indictment arose out of an investigation by the Insurance Commissioner of Consumers and Distributors Insurance Exchange (Consumers) a reciprocal insurer (Ins. Code, §§ 1280-1540 1 ) and Indemnity Management Corporation (Indemnity) its attorney-in-fact. On August 7, 1964, upon his application asserting inter alia…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. United States v. MoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. People v. EisemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. People v. SchwarzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. MowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. BackusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. SkeltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API