Legal Opinion

Drucker v. Mauro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 20, 2006PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Tom, J.P.

At issue on this appeal is whether plaintiff tenants can enforce a lease and rider incorporating the terms of a stipulated settlement agreement that, while not in compliance with the provisions of the Rent Stabilization Law, is favorable to the tenants’ interests. In keeping with well-established precedent, this Court holds that an agreement in purported or actual settlement of a landlord-tenant dispute which waives the benefit of a statutory protection is unenforceable as a matter of public policy, even if it benefits the tenant.

In November 1981, plaintiffs John…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Thornton v. BaronNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Manocherian v. Lenox Hill HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Dworman v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Estro Chemical Co. v. FalkNew York Court of Appeals · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Gersten v. 56 7th Avenue LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Borden v. 400 East 55th Street Associates, L.P.New York Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Partnership 92 LP v. State of New York Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Roberts v. Tishman Speyer Properties, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. 546 West 156th Street HDFC v. SmallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API