Legal Opinion
Thornton v. Baron
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 2005PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Kaye.
We are asked in this appeal to establish the legal regulated rent for an apartment improperly removed from rent stabilization.
Defendant 390 West End Associates is the owner of the Apthorp, a residential apartment building on the Upper West Side of Manhattan. In the early 1990s, the owner hit upon a scheme to remove a number of its apartments from the protect *178tions of rent regulation by taking advantage of the statutory exemption for nonprimary residences (see Rent Stabilization Law of 1969 [Administrative Code of City of NY] § 26-504 [a] [1] [f]). Having…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Buran v. CoupalNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Gilman v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Draper v. Georgia Properties, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- 390 West End Associates v. BaronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by87 opinions
- Conason v. Megan Holding, LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- Grimm v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Partnership 92 LP v. State of New York Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Partnership 92 LP v. State of New York Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Drucker v. MauroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.