Legal Opinion
Toyota of Visalia, Inc. v. Department of Motor Vehicles
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 2, 1984No. Civ. 7617PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZENOVICH, J.
This case is before us on an appeal by the Department of Motor Vehicles and the New Motor Vehicle Board from that portion of the judgment which grants a peremptory writ of mandamus commanding them to set aside the revocation of the automobile dealers’ licenses of Toyota of Visalia and Pioneer Dodge and to reconsider the penalties previously imposed. That part of the judgment which denies the petition for writ of mandamus is appealed by Toyota of Visalia and Pioneer Dodge.
The Department of Motor Vehicles (Department) filed accusations against Toyota of Visalia (Toyota) and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kazensky v. City of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Talmo v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Schmitt v. City of RialtoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Trailer Train Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.