Legal Opinion
Schmitt v. City of Rialto
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 16, 1985No. Civ. 33128PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
Plaintiff Martin Schmitt was discharged as a police officer of the City of Rialto. He sought a writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) to have his discharge set aside. The superior court granted the writ, and the city 1 appeals. We reverse.
Background Facts
The administrative proceedings leading up to plaintiff’s discharge relate to two alleged incidents of misconduct.
The first charge against plaintiff was that he had knowledge of and was a principal in the crime of child endangerment (Pen. Code, § 273a). School officials called the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Anton v. San Antonio Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Kazensky v. City of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Mohilef v. JanoviciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Talmo v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Citizens for East Shore Parks v. State Lands CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- California Real Estate Loans, Inc. v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.