Hughes v. Board of Architectural Examiners
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HULL, J.
This case has been remanded to us by the California Supreme Court in order to resolve one issue: did the Board of Architectural Examiners (the Board) impose an excessive sanction in revoking the architect’s license of plaintiff Charles Hughes? (Hughes v. Board of Architectural Examiners (1998) 17 Cal.4th 763, 795 [72 Cal.Rptr.2d 624, 952 P.2d 641].) We conclude the discipline imposed was well within the Board’s discretion and therefore affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
The relevant background to this case was set forth at length in Hughes v. Board of Architectual…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Barber v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Cranston v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Kazensky v. City of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- California Real Estate Loans, Inc. v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State ex rel. Wilson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Hanna v. Dental BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Tue Ngoc Hoang v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Imports Performance v. Department of Consumer AffairsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Moustafa v. Bd. of Registered Nursing, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.