Legal Opinion

Midland-Ross Corp. v. Sunbeam Equipment Corp.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 17, 1970No. Civ. A. 70-769PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOURLEY, District Judge:

In this civil action, the Complaint asserts two causes of action. The first cause of action is founded upon the alleged infringement by defendant Sunbeam Equipment Corporation of two patents claimed by plaintiff involving the construction and general method of operation of carburizing furnaces manufactured by plaintiff’s Surface Combustion Division. The relief sought upon this first cause of action is damages and a permanent injunction. The second cause of action is founded upon the alalleged misappropriation of plaintiff’s trade secrets relating to carburizing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Van Products Co. v. General Welding & Fabricating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Midland-Ross Corporation v. Lucian D. Yokana and Sterling Extruder CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sims v. MacK Truck Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. International Election Systems Corp. v. ShoupDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Permagrain Products, Inc. v. U. S. Mat & Rubber Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Van Dyk Research Corp. v. SCM Corp. (In Re Van Dyk Research Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
  5. Bravo v. Board of Education of City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API