Midland-Ross Corp. v. Sunbeam Equipment Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOURLEY, District Judge:
In this civil action, the Complaint asserts two causes of action. The first cause of action is founded upon the alleged infringement by defendant Sunbeam Equipment Corporation of two patents claimed by plaintiff involving the construction and general method of operation of carburizing furnaces manufactured by plaintiff’s Surface Combustion Division. The relief sought upon this first cause of action is damages and a permanent injunction. The second cause of action is founded upon the alalleged misappropriation of plaintiff’s trade secrets relating to carburizing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Van Products Co. v. General Welding & Fabricating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Midland-Ross Corporation v. Lucian D. Yokana and Sterling Extruder CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sims v. MacK Truck Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- International Election Systems Corp. v. ShoupDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Permagrain Products, Inc. v. U. S. Mat & Rubber Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Van Dyk Research Corp. v. SCM Corp. (In Re Van Dyk Research Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
- Bravo v. Board of Education of City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.