Midland-Ross Corporation v. Lucian D. Yokana and Sterling Extruder Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court for the District of New Jersey denying the plaintiff an injunction but retaining jurisdiction for such further proceedings as are neces sary. The interlocutory appeal is timely and allowable. 1 Federal jurisdiction is based on diversity. The plaintiff is an Ohio corporation. The defendants are an individual citizen of New Jersey and a New Jersey corporation. All the operative facts occurred in New Jersey. New Jersey law governs the substantive rights of the parties.
The plaintiff is a successor to a corporation…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sun Dial Corp. v. RideoutSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Adolph Gottscho, Inc. v. American Marking Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Midland-Ross Corporation v. YokanaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1960
3Cited by30 opinions
- SI Handling Systems, Inc. v. HeisleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- National Rejectors, Inc. v. TriemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Standard Brands, Inc. v. ZumpeDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
- Telex Corp. v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1973
- Rohm And Haas Company v. Adco Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.