Legal Opinion

Hein v. Hein

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1995No. Docket 162284PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

Respondent Herbert Hein, trustee, appeals as of right an order denying his petition to set aside a judgment terminating the trust of which he was trustee and a residual beneficiary. We affirm.

The trust in question was an irrevocable spendthrift trust. The settlors and lifetime beneficiaries were Edmund and Else Hein, and the residual beneficiaries were their children. Respondent, the settlors’ son, was both the trustee and a residual beneficiary of the trust. All the concerned parties are living, and none are incapacitated.

Edmund Hein petitioned to terminate the trust, delete specific…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rose v. Southern Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Botzum v. Havana National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Fowler v. LanpherWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. St. Louis Union Trust Company v. ConantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  5. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. HurlbuttSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Neeley v. NeeleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
  2. PLAINS COMMERCE BANK, INC. v. BECKSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  3. IN RE: FREI IRREVOCABLE TRUSTNevada Supreme Court · 2017
  4. IN RE: FREI IRREVOCABLE TRUSTNevada Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API