Legal Opinion

Neeley v. Neeley

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 21, 2000No. 81,527PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brazil, C.J.:

Robert M. Neeley, Bernice J. Kuckelman, and Mary Lou Pack (plaintiffs), có-trustees and beneficiaries of a revocable spendthrift trust (Trust) executed by their father Oren T. Neeley, brought this action to modify the terms of the Trust. They appeal from the decision of the trial court denying their petition to modify.

We affirm.

The facts are not in dispute and will not be reviewed except as necessary for purposes of this opinion. On appeal, the plaintiffs challenge the legal conclusions of the trial court. This court’s review of conclusions of law is unlimited. See Taliaferro v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of SandersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  2. Taliaferro v. TaliaferroSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  3. McClary v. HarbaughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  4. Hein v. HeinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Musick v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Harris Testamentary TrustSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. In re Trust Created by McGregorNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Case v. Hilgers Ex Rel. Blanche A. Hilgers Trust (In Re Hilgers)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2006
  4. In re Max Hacker Family TrustCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2026
  5. In re St. Clair Trust ReformationSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API