Legal Opinion

Rose v. Southern Michigan National Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1931No. Docket No. 158, Calendar No. 35,657PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

Lester E. Rose died leaving a will in which he devised the major portion of a large estate in trust. The Southern Michigan National Bank was named executor and trustee. The plaintiffs, who are all of the direct heirs, contested the will. After a prolonged trial in the circuit court, it was sustained by a directed verdict. An appeal was taken, and, after the bill of exceptions was settled and signed, a compromise agreement was entered into by all of the direct and collateral heirs. The executor and trustee did not join in the settlement. Pursuant to Act No. 249, Pub. Acts. 1921 (3 Comp. Laws…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. Los Angeles Trust & Sav. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Olsen v. YoungermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Wagner v. WagnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Kessner v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  5. Ellis v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Dodge v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Altemeier v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  3. George v. HaberMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  4. In Re Edgar EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. In Re Ford's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API