Legal Opinion
Addison v. Sedco Forex, U.S.A.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided July 27, 1992No. 4:92-cv-00817PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SANDERS, Chief Judge.
Before thé Court are Plaintiff Addison’s Motion for Remand, filed May 22,1992, and Defendants’ (collectively “Forex”) Opposition thereto, filed June 8, 1992. Addison has filed no reply, see Local Rule 5.1(f), and his motion now applies to his cause of action as represented in Plaintiff’s First Amended Original Complaint (“Amended Complaint”), filed without objection June 29, 1992. 1
I. Background
Addison’s complaint alleges the following: Addison was employed by Forex 2 as an oil rig driller when he was injured on the job on July 6, 1989. Based…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rozzell v. Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- McClelland v. GronwaldtDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1995
- Rutland v. Office of the Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1994
- Mills v. INJURY BENEFITS PLAN OF SCHEPPS-FOREMOSTDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1993