Rutland v. Office of the Attorney General
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
FISH, District Judge.
This case is before the court on the motion of defendants, the Injury Benefits Plan of Schepps-Foremost, Inc. and Southern Foods, Inc. (“the Plan”) and Schepps-Foremost, Inc., d/b/a Oak Farms Dairies (“Oak Farms”), to dismiss the plaintiffs claims against them and on the motion of the plaintiff, Walter Mills (“Mills”), to remand or dismiss this ease. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part and, with respect to the claims remaining, Mills’ motion to *806remand this case to the County Court at Law Number…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rutland v. Office of Atty. Gen., State of Miss.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1994