Legal Opinion
Cahill v. Readon
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided December 3, 1928No. 11,978PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Denison
Mbs. Cahill brought action against Mrs. Readon to cancel an exchange of real estate because of fraud. She was defeated on trial to the court and brings error. The judgment must be reversed.
The court made a general finding for defendant and there is some evidence to support it, but notwithstanding this the plaintiff in error claims, and we think rightly, that the evidence for the plaintiff is convincing beyond a reasonable doubt that she was fraudulently overreached. Whittemore v. Wilkins, 77 Colo. 533, 238 Pac. 69.
The essential facts as shown by the evidence are as follows: Plaintiff Cahill,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Copper Process Co. v. Chicago Bonding & Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1920
- Welborn v. CobbSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- Gerner v. YatesNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
- Hankins v. Farmers' & Merchants' BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Treat v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Berger v. Security Pacific Information Systems, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Blanton v. Sherman Compress Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- H. B. Bolas Enterprises, Inc. v. ZarlengoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
- Kabatchnick v. Hanover-Elm Building Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Borzillo v. ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.