Legal Opinion

Hankins v. Farmers' & Merchants' Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 17, 1914No. 3207PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Brror from County Court, Bilis County; A. L- Squires, Judge. . Action by the Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank against Amanda J. Hankins. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PIARRISON, C.

This was an action in replevin by the Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank against Amanda J. Hankins for possession of certain horses, mules, and a certain cow claimed under a chattel mortgage, and for judgment on a ndte for $363.45. The note in question was executed and delivered to one W. H. Springfield, an attorney, and a chattel mortgage on the property in question given to Springfield to secure the payment of the note, and on the same day or the day following it was assigned (the petition alleged that it was assigned by Springfield on the day following), but Mr. Fiambre, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rumbaugh v. RumbaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cahill v. ReadonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  2. Cooper v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. International News Service v. News Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Stevens v. PattenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Hooker v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API