Copper Process Co. v. Chicago Bonding & Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; J. Whitaker Thompson, Judge. Five actions by the Copper Process Company against the Chicago Bonding & Insurance Company, which were consolidated and tried as one. There was a judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
These writs-of-error bring here for review five judgments of the District Court entered on verdict in a proceeding 'wherein five actions were consolidated and tried as one. The Copper Process Company was plaintiff; the Chicago Bonding and Insurance Company was defendant. The actions were on bonds of the defendant company, each for $52,400, given the plaintiff company to assure performance by the Bird Coal and Iron Company of its undertakings in the same number of contracts between it and the Copper Company for the sale and delivery of pig iron. The Iron Company…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fillippon v. Albion Vein Slate Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Salmon v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862
- De Ruiter v. De RuiterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
- Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. GillespieCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1915
3Cited by23 opinions
- Twachtman v. ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Worthington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
- Berry v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Cahill v. ReadonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- Nevada National Bank v. Gold Star Meat CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.