Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard Mittelman Weldon Ray Reeves
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 21, 1993No. 92-10623PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Chief Judge:
The government appeals from the district court’s order suppressing all evidence seized during a warranted search of Reeves’s law office. The government argues that the district court clearly erred in finding .both that Federal Bureau of Investigation Agent Per-eira (Agent) made false statements to' the federal magistrate who issued the warrant and that the resulting search exceeded the scope of the warrant. The government also argues that the court erred in suppressing all evidence seized during the search, including evidence within the scope of the warrant. The district…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Leigh Raymond TamuraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Clarence Jay Crozier, Manuel Isadore Pine, Alan Terry Stein, and Florence Margaret WolkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Louis John Ippolito, Michael Contino, Irving Schwartz, William Darnold, Lawrence Miller, Thomas Arrants, and Arthur Joseph NatoliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- United States v. John SearsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- State v. VerrecchiaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Paul L. Gabbert v. David Conn Carol Najera Leslie Zoeller Elliot OppenheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.