United States v. John Sears
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge.
In this case, we must determine the proper remedy for a search pursuant to a warrant that, due to police error in preparing the document for distribution, contained eight words not reviewed by a neutral magistrate. The eight words were “or nearby” (twice) and “but not limited to.” It is undisputed that those words expanded the scope of the search and violated the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment. Defendant John Sears appeals the district court’s decision to remedy this Fourth Amendment violation by suppressing only that evidence seized…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Groh v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ewing v. City of StocktonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. SDI Future Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Millender v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- State of Maine v. James R. Simmons State of Maine v. Frederick A. CampbellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- United States v. HurdCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.