Legal Opinion
United States v. Louis John Ippolito, Michael Contino, Irving Schwartz, William Darnold, Lawrence Miller, Thomas Arrants, and Arthur Joseph Natoli
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 29, 1985No. 84-5257PublishedCited by 130 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
The United States appeals from the district court’s suppression of information gained through wiretaps. The district court relied on Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978), to hold that false and misleading information in government affidavits concerning the necessity of the wiretaps required suppression of the information derived from the wiretaps. We affirm.
FACTS
On November 3, 1982, the district court issued an order allowing the government to intercept certain wire communications. The government’s application for the order was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Willie H. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. John MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by130 opinions
- Sherwood v. MulvihillCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Robert Stewart v. Donald DongesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. ShryockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Darrel Paterson Simpson, Robert MacRiner Anderson, and James Roy FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.