Legal Opinion
Veridyne Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 5, 2012No. 06-150CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge.
This case is before the court after trial on defendant’s petition for costs of review pursuant to the anti-fraud provision of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (“CDA”), 41 U.S.C. § 7103(c)(2) (Supp. IV 2011). In an opinion dated July 6, 2012, this court held, in part, that plaintiff violated the anti-fraud provision of the CDA. Defendant now seeks a judgment of $357,256.08 under § 7103(c)(2) for its costs attributable to reviewing the unsupported parts of plaintiffs claim. The key issue for decision is whether defendant has provided…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Naporano Iron and Metal Company, Andrew J. Naporano and Beatrice Naporano, Andrew J. Naporano and Sharon Naporano v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Avgoustis v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Applegate v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- GULF GROUP GENERAL ENTERPRISES CO. W.L.L., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, DefendantUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Chapman Law Firm, LPA v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Horn & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.