Legal Opinion

MacKenzie v. Wales Township

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 2001No. Docket 219806PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

Plaintiff Robert MacKenzie appeals as of right the order denying his motion for summary disposition and granting summary disposition in favor of defendants Wales Township and Fort Gratiot Charter Township. We reverse and remand.

Both defendants contracted with the city of Port Huron to prepare property tax notices for mailing to property owners in their respective townships. Using paper tax documents provided by the townships, Port Huron created magnetic computer tapes containing the pertinent tax information on each individual property owner. Port Huron then returned the paper tax documents…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Forsham v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Herald Co. v. City of Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Flagg ex rel. Bond v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
  2. Detroit Free Press, Inc v. City of SouthfieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. City of Warren v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Detroit News, Inc. v. Policemen and Firemen Retirement System of City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Hopkins v. Duncan TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API