Legal Opinion

Roti v. Washington

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 10, 1983No. 83-1146PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jiganti

Both the plaintiffs and the defendants in this case have sought the aid of the courts in order to resolve several legal issues that arose during the course of the legislative process. This lawsuit requires the court to address the legal issues stemming from a dispute that arose in the Chicago city council between the plaintiffs, 29 aldermen, and the defendants, 21 aldermen and Harold Washington, the mayor of Chicago. We stress at the onset that this court’s function is not to question the wisdom of any legislation or to examine the distribution of power in the city council. Those are…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Denio v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Shanahan v. SchindlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. People ex rel. Conlon v. MountIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. City of Biddeford v. YatesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908
  5. American Aberdeen-Angus Breeders' Ass'n v. FullertonIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith, Ed H. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Henry Hudson v. Edward M. Burke and the City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Roti v. WashingtonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Hudson v. BurkeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  5. Independent Voters of Illinois Independent Precinct Organization v. AhmadAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API