Shanahan v. Schindler
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mejda
Plaintiff, Herbert J. Shanahan, brought this action against defendant, William E. Schindler, to recover the sum remaining unpaid upon a promissory note. Judgment was entered by confession; however, defendant filed a timely motion to open the judgment. The court subsequently granted defendant leave to appear and defend, with the judgment by confession standing as security. A trial was then had before the court, without a jury, resulting in a judgment for defendant. It is from this judgment that plaintiff appeals.
We affirm. The following facts, upon which the parties essentially agree, have…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brown v. ZimmermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Roda v. BerkoIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
- Meyer v. BuckmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
- Geist v. LehmannAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Zaborowski v. Hoffman Rosner Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Ainsworth Corp. v. Cenco, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Central States Joint Board v. Continental Assurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Lovejoy Electronics, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Gerald N. O'berto, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Belleville National Bank v. RoseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Straits Fin. LLC v. Ten Sleep Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.