Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Waterhouse
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 14, 1992No. 85 Civ. 4787 (JES)PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge:
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) brings this action against defendants Price Water-house (“Price Waterhouse” or “PW”), Daniel W. Jerbasi (“Jerbasi”), Benjamin W. Perks (“Perks”), and Michael D. LeRoy (“LeRoy”), (collectively, the “PW defendants”), alleging (1) primary violations of Section 17(a)(l)-(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“the Securities Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)(l)-(3) (1988), Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“the Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) (1988) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Robert Garfield v. NDCHealth CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Paul Stevelman, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Alias Research Inc. And Stephen R.B. BinghamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- In Re Worlds Of Wonder Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Pr Diamonds, Inc. v. John P. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- In Re Refco, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.