Legal Opinion

City of Carson v. County Commissioners

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1924No. 2625PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*417By the Court,-

Coleman, J.:

This is an original proceeding in mandamus.

The petition alleges that the city of Carson is a municipal corporation existing under and by virtue of a special act of the legislature of the state entitled “An act to incorporate Carson City,” as amended March 11, 1921 (Stats. 1921, p. 140) ; that the individual petitioners are the duly elected, qualified, and acting trustees thereof; that the defendants are, and ever since the first Monday in January, 1921, have been, the duly elected, qualified, and acting commissioners of the county of Ormsby, State of Nevada, and ever…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of WalleyNevada Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Thorpe v. SchoolingNevada Supreme Court · 1871
  3. State ex rel. Pacific Reclamation Co. v. DuckerNevada Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State ex rel. Abel v. EggersNevada Supreme Court · 1913
  5. State ex rel. Freuden-Berger v. ColeNevada Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ronnow v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State v. EconomyNevada Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Western Realty Co. v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1946
  4. SOUTHERN NEVADA TELEPHONE CO. v. ChristoffersenNevada Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. ReeseNevada Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API