Legal Opinion
State v. Economy
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided October 20, 1942No. 3374PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Ducker, C. J. :
Defendant was convicted in the district court of peddling a narcotic drug known as marihuana, in violation of section 5 of the narcotic act of 1923', as amended by the act of 1935, chap. 33, Session Laws 1923, pages 39, 40, 41; chap. 73, Session Laws 1935, pages 160, 161. Section 1 of the former act, as amended by the act of 1931, chap. 43, Session Laws 1931, pages 51, 52 reads:
“Each and all of the following are hereby declared to be narcotic drugs: Cannabis indica, cocaine, opium, yen shee, morphine, codeine, heroin, marihuana, anhalonium (peyote or mescal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- United States v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Bartlet v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
- Pratt Institute v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Henrietta Mining & Milling Co. v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Steve A. WaltonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. MilesIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Washington v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.