SOUTHERN NEVADA TELEPHONE CO. v. Christoffersen
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Thompson, J.:
Christoffersen commenced this action against Southern Nevada Telephone Company to recover the penalties provided by Ch. 274, Stats. Nev. 1913, contending that he had requested telephone service but none was furnished. The lower court found for Christoffersen and entered judgment against the telephone company for $2,040, from which judgment the latter has appealed.
The mentioned statute reads: “Section 1. Upon the application in writing of the owner or occupant of any building or premises located within a telephone exchange district distant not more than two…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. EconomyNevada Supreme Court · 1942
- City of Carson v. County CommissionersNevada Supreme Court · 1924
- State ex rel. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- State Public Utilities Commission ex rel. Baber v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by6 opinions
- Washington v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Longacre v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
- Washington v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. ThompsonNevada Supreme Court · 1973
- Young v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.