Legal Opinion

SOUTHERN NEVADA TELEPHONE CO. v. Christoffersen

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1961No. 4361PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

Christoffersen commenced this action against Southern Nevada Telephone Company to recover the penalties provided by Ch. 274, Stats. Nev. 1913, contending that he had requested telephone service but none was furnished. The lower court found for Christoffersen and entered judgment against the telephone company for $2,040, from which judgment the latter has appealed.

The mentioned statute reads: “Section 1. Upon the application in writing of the owner or occupant of any building or premises located within a telephone exchange district distant not more than two…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. EconomyNevada Supreme Court · 1942
  2. City of Carson v. County CommissionersNevada Supreme Court · 1924
  3. State ex rel. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  4. State Public Utilities Commission ex rel. Baber v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Washington v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Longacre v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Washington v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. ThompsonNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Young v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API