Hammers v. Merrick
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from. Harper District Court. The facts are stated in the opinion. Judgment for plaintiffs, Merrick & Rinehart, for $798.17, on October 28, 1886. The defendants, Hammers and Forbes, bring the case here.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Holt, C.:
The defendants in error, as plaintiffs, filed their petition in the Harper district court, in which they set forth that they were partners, negotiating sales of real estate and stock ranches in Kansas, and of stock ranches in the Indian Territory; that in August, 1883, they entered into a contract with the defendants as Hammers, Forbes & *33Co., for the sale of their ranch in the Indian Territory, or an undivided one-half thereof; that by its terms they were either to sell, or to find a purchaser; that for their services in selling, or procuring a purchaser, Hammers, Forbes &…
2Cited by4 opinions
- King v. StephensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Leatherman v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Phœnix Securities Co. v. DittmarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
- Jones v. Stedman Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937