Legal Opinion

Martorano v. Capital Finance Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 1941Published

1DissentO’Malley, J.

(dissenting.) The question presented is whether a fee paid by a borrower for insurance on a chattel taken as a partial security for a loan of $300 or less is to be considered a “ further or other charge or amount whatsoever for any examination, service, brokerage, commission, expense, fee, or bonus or other thing or otherwise * * * ” (italics ours), under section 352 of the Banking Law.

Plaintiffs borrowed from defendant, a licensed finance company under the Banking Law, the sum of $300, giving a note in that amount. As security, there was given a chattel mortgage upon an automobile and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Niles v. KavanaghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Equity Service Corp. v. AgullAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. Stuback v. SussmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. Platz v. LapinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Stuback v. SussmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API