Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Shoney's, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 24, 2003No. 02-5991PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*156 ORDER
Plaintiffs, Candice V. Coleman, Kimberly D. Coleman, and Nisa Hawkins, proceeding pro se, appeal the jury verdict for the defendant, Shoney’s, Inc. (“Shoney’s”), in this employment discrimination action brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
On December 23, 1999, the plaintiffs, who were represented by counsel, brought this civil rights…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- James M. Jourdan, Jr. v. John Jabe and L. BoydCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Rosalind K. Reed, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Ncmic Ins. Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Alan Geboy, Petitioner-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Anthony Brigano, Warden, Respondent-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- National City Bank v. AronsonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- Anderson v. WorthingtonDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
- Baldwin v. HudsonDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.