Legal Opinion

National City Bank v. Aronson

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided February 21, 2007No. 2:06-mj-00189PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MARBLEY, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Objection to the Report and Recommendation Issued by the Honorable Magistrate Judge Granting the Plaintiffs Motion to Remand and Awarding the Plaintiff Costs and Fees Incurred in Connection with the Removal of this Action (“Defendants’ Objection”). (Doc. #26). In the Report and Recommendation, (Doc. # 25), the Magistrate Judge recommended that this action be remanded and that plaintiff be granted its costs and fees associated with the improper removal of this action. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), this…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. James M. Jourdan, Jr. v. John Jabe and L. BoydCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ncmic Ins. Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
  2. Leys v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
  3. Aghdashloo v. Parvaresh MohseniDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
  4. Bishop v. Bennett Motor Express LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024
  5. CentralSquare Technologies, LLC v. The National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel InspectorsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API