Henry McCone v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
Pro se plaintiff-appellant Henry McCone appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his Title VII employment discrimination claim, 42. U.S.C. § 2000e et seq, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Fed.R.Civ.P. (Rule) 12(b)(6). After a thorough review of the record, we affirm.
I
McCone filed a second amended complaint against Pitney Bowes, Inc. and Pitney Bowes Management Services, Inc. (collectively “Pitney Bowes”), alleging that Pitney Bowes discriminated against him based on his gender.
McCone began working for Pitney Bowes 1 as a non-driving customer service…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Winstead v. Lafayette County Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2016
- Franklin v. Pitts.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- Gipson v. CochranDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2015
- Methelus v. School Board of Collier CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
- English v. Board of School CommissionersDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2015
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.