Legal Opinion
United States v. Siegel
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided December 30, 1996No. 95-2496PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VINING, Senior District Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION.
In this appeal, we review the validity of a guilty plea. The district court failed to advise the defendant of the maximum and mandatory penalties associated with several of the charged offenses. We REVERSE in part, VACATE, and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On June 30,1993, Robert Siegel and others were indicted for robbing several jewelry stores across the United States. Specifically, the indictment charged Siegel with engaging in a pattern of racketeering activities, in violation…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Winston Eugene DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Robert Clay Medlock, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. James Buckles, A/K/A Jimmy BucklesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Terry Russell GoinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. David Wayne MonroeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Demond L. Osley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.