Legal Opinion
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Robert Clay Medlock, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided January 21, 1994No. 92-4746PublishedCited by 165 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAY, Senior Circuit Judge:
Medlock pled guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and now alleges that the district court erroneously denied his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. 1 The government cross-appeals, alleging that the district court erred in striking the Armed Career Criminal enhancement to Medlock’s sentence. We AFFIRM the district court’s denial of Medlock’s motion to withdraw the plea, agree with the government that his sentence should have been enhanced, and REMAND for resentencing.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
A federal grand jury indicted Medlock for possession of a firearm…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Parke v. RaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Scott Evan JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by165 opinions
- United States v. PeaseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Gonzalo De Jesus TamayoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. J.B. Farris, United States of America v. Jeffrey Bernard BushCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Ravikumar Ghanshymbha Patel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.