United States v. David Wayne Monroe
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HULL, Circuit Judge:
After entering a guilty plea, David Wayne Monroe appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). For the first time on appeal, Monroe contends that the district court committed plain error during his Rule 11 plea colloquy by not explicitly informing him of his right against compelled self-incrimination. After review, we affirm.
I. FACTS
On April 3, 2001, Monroe pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute an amount greater than five grams of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). At the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- United States v. Jason M. MoriartyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Trelliny T. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Quan ChauCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Jesse Wright, Jr., A.K.A. Jessie WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.