Legal Opinion

United States v. David Wayne Monroe

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 24, 2003No. 02-12918PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULL, Circuit Judge:

After entering a guilty plea, David Wayne Monroe appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). For the first time on appeal, Monroe contends that the district court committed plain error during his Rule 11 plea colloquy by not explicitly informing him of his right against compelled self-incrimination. After review, we affirm.

I. FACTS

On April 3, 2001, Monroe pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute an amount greater than five grams of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). At the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. United States v. Jason M. MoriartyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Trelliny T. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Quan ChauCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Jesse Wright, Jr., A.K.A. Jessie WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API