Legal Opinion

State v. Maryland

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 5, 2001PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

COLEMAN, J.

This is a warrantless search and seizure case in which defendant contends that he was selected for questioning by the police because of his race. The trial court declined to address that claim in denying defendant’s motion to suppress evidence filed pursuant to Rule 3:5-7, and a divided Appellate Division affirmed. We reverse.

We consider the question whether defendant was selected for questioning because of his race to be critical. We hold that although a field inquiry may be conducted when the police have not observed the individual…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. State v. EldersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  2. State v. PineiroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  3. State v. CartySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  4. State v. NishinaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  5. State v. StovallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API