Legal Opinion

State v. Elders

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 30, 2007PublishedCited by 453 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Albin

In State v. Carty, 170 N.J. 632, 635, 790 A.2d 903, modified on other grounds, 174 N.J. 351, 806 A.2d 798 (2002), we held that a police officer may not ask for consent to search a lawfully stopped vehicle or its occupants unless the officer has “a reasonable and articulable suspicion” that the occupants are engaged in criminal wrongdoing. A consent search of a validly stopped ear without the requisite suspicion will result in exclusion of the evidence at trial. Id. at 647 — 18, 790 A.2d 903. In this appeal, we must decide whether the principles of Carty extend to the occupants of a ear…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  4. State v. LocurtoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  5. New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services v. M.M.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by453 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  2. State v. NashSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  3. State v. GandhiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  4. State v. Kevin Gamble (071234)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  5. State v. Terrell Hubbard (073539)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015

448 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API