Legal Opinion

State v. Carty

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 4, 2002PublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

COLEMAN, J.

This consensual search and seizure case presents the novel question whether a request to search a motor vehicle, following a valid stop by the police, requires reasonable and articulable suspicion that a search would reveal evidence of criminal wrongdoing. The Appellate Division held that a request for consent absent reasonable and articulable suspicion violated the New Jersey Constitution and reversed the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress.

We hold that, in order for a consent to search a motor vehicle and its occupants…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. State v. EldersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  2. State of Iowa v. Randall Lee PalsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  3. State v. William L. Witt(074468)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  4. State v. RankinWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 2005

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API