State v. Carty
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
COLEMAN, J.
This consensual search and seizure case presents the novel question whether a request to search a motor vehicle, following a valid stop by the police, requires reasonable and articulable suspicion that a search would reveal evidence of criminal wrongdoing. The Appellate Division held that a request for consent absent reasonable and articulable suspicion violated the New Jersey Constitution and reversed the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress.
We hold that, in order for a consent to search a motor vehicle and its occupants…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- State v. EldersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- State of Iowa v. Randall Lee PalsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- State v. William L. Witt(074468)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
- State v. RankinWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.