Legal Opinion
Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 24, 2002No. Consol. & 99-09-00566PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARZILAY, Judge.
I. Introduction
This opinion constitutes the latest writing in a continuing effort of this court to clarify the statutory and case law concerning when non-recurring subsidies can continue to be countervailable after a formerly subsidized business entity is privatized. The court now reviews the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce” or “Department”) Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Allegheny Ludlum Corp., et al. v. United States, Court No. 99-09-00566 (CIT Jan. 4, 2002) (June 3, 2002) (“Remand Determination II ”). This case originated pursuant to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Delverde, Srl and Delverde Usa, Inc. v. United States v. Borden, Inc., Hershey Foods Corp. And Gooch Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- GTS Industries S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Ilva Lamiere E Tubi S.R.L. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Acciali Speciali Terni S.P.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
3Cited by6 opinions
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Acciai Speciali Terni S.P.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Acciai Speciali Terni S.p.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp., Armco, Inc. (Now Known as Ak Steel), the United Steel Workers of America, AFL Cio/clc, Butler Armco Independent Union, and Zanesville Armco Independent Organization v. United States v. Usinor, Ugine S.A., and Uginox Sales Corporation, and Usinor Stainless Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.