Legal Opinion
Universal CIT Credit Corporation v. Gogos
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 18, 1962No. 3053PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the grant of summary judgment for appellee on the ground that the present action was res judicata because of a former action between the same parties.
In the present action appellant sought judgment for $1,232.17, the alleged deficiency due under a conditional sale of an automobile after repossession and sale. In the previous action, entitled as one in deti-nue, appellant alleged the conditional sale of the automobile and default in payment, and sought “return of the vehicle or payment in full” of $2,382.58. It concluded by demanding judgment for $2,382.58…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burns v. FinckeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Associates Discount Corporation v. HardestyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Nagle v. QuenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Thomas v. Marvins Credit, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- Marvins Credit, Inc. v. MorganDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Williams v. Mount Jezreel Baptist ChurchDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Parker v. MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re Estate of HimmelfarbDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Becton v. Walker-Thomas Furniture CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- Himmelfarb v. GreenspoonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.