Marvins Credit, Inc. v. Morgan

CAYTON, Chief Judge..The question before us is whether a plaintiff, basing his claim on a conditional sale agreement, was entitled to a judgment not only for the balance due under the agreement, but also alternatively for the return of the chattels involved.

The conditional sale agreement in this case covered certain bedroom furniture sold by Marvins Credit to defendant and contained, along with reservation of title and other usual clauses, a provision authorizing the vendor to repossess the furniture upon purchaser’s default in payment. Marvins sued in the Municipal Court alleging that…