Legal Opinion

Parker v. Martin

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 17, 2006No. 04-CV-262PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Senior Judge:

This is an appeal from the entry of summary judgment to the defendants in an action for damages on account of lead poisoning. We reverse the judgment in part and remand for further proceedings.

Between 1979 and July 1984, Louise Parker and her two teenage children resided as tenants in an apartment at 1600 A Street, Unit 2, in Northeast Washington, D.C. (“the Property”). On November 13, 1980, Louise Parker’s daughter, appellant Cynthia Parker, gave birth to appellant David Matthews (collectively “the Par-kers”). The property was owned by appel-lees Dr. Harold and Ms. Jametta…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. I.A.M. National Pension Fund, Benefit Plan a v. Industrial Gear Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  3. Juarez v. Wavecrest Management Team Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Diamond v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Washington Medical Center, Inc. v. HolleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gomez v. Independence Management of Delaware, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Herrion v. Children'S Hospital Natl. Medical CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. Koker v. Aurora Loan Servicing, LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
  4. Mamo v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Crawford v. KatzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API