Legal Opinion

Himmelfarb v. Greenspoon

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 1975No. 8663PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Associate Judge:

This case involves the second caveat filed to contest the will (and four codicils thereto) of Paul Himmelfarb.1 The issue is whether appellant Julian Himmelfarb, one of the decedent’s eight children, is barred by either res judicata or equitable estoppel from filing a caveat in the prolonged litigation concerning his father’s estate.

Appellant’s caveat makes basically the same allegations as those set forth in an earlier caveat which had been filed by one of his sisters, Jean Horwitz. The first caveat was compromised. Appellant did not sign the settlement agreement,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Menendez v. Saks And CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. Botz v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  4. Parker v. SagerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  5. Goodman v. DickerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of HimmelfarbDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API