Legal Opinion

Andrew v. Sac County State Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 14, 1928PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.

— This proceeding was determined entirely upon a stipulation of facts filed by the parties May 24, 1926, as follows :

“Come now the above-named intervener and the above-named plaintiff as receiver of the defendant bank and stipulate that the following facts are and shall be considered as evidence and proven facts in the trial of this cause.
“1. Petition in the above-entitled cause was filed by the above-named plaintiff on or about November 25, 1925, asking for the appointment ,of a receiver for the defendant bank for the purpose of liquidating said bank, and upon said date the said L. A.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Officer v. OfficerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. Dolph v. CrossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Easton v. SomervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. Leach v. Iowa State Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Leach v. BeazleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Des Moines National Bank v. BatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  2. Andrew v. Farmers Sav. Bk. of GoldfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  3. Rottger, Rec. v. First-Merchants Natl. BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Andrew v. Colo Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Baitinger v. ElmoreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API