Legal Opinion

Baitinger v. Elmore

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 12, 1929No. 39972PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

The breach of the bond originally alleged is deposit of funds of the ward in savings account, at interest, withdrawable only on 60 days’ notice, in a bank which later failed. Negligence in this and also in making a deposit in a checking account in the same bank is alleged, but, as will be seen, is not material to this appeal. By amendment, plaintiff alleged that, since the commencement of the action, the guardian had been ordered to, but had wholly failed to, render any accounting. The surety’s principal proposition is that an accounting by the guardian is a necessary prerequisite to an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hood v. . HoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Perkins v. . StimmelNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Andrew v. Farmers Sav. Bk. of GoldfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  4. Andrew v. Sac County State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Garner v. HendrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1895

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Guardianship of DamonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. In Re Estate of MowreySupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. In Re Estate of SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  4. In Re Estate of JeffersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  5. Faith v. National Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API