Legal Opinion
Andrew v. Colo Savings Bank
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided April 3, 1928PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.
—There is little dispute concerning the facts, and the question before us for determination is very largely one of law. It is conceded that the Colo Savings Bank was an active and going concern prior to the 13th day of February, 1926, and during -its period of operation, John H. Eidgway, the appellee, on or about the 5th day of February of that year, deposited in the banking establishment $1,227.50, and he received at that time the following certificate therefor:
“Colo Savings Bank
“Certificate of Deposit 72-1257 No. 8762.
“Colo, Iowa, Feb. 5, 1926.
“John H. Eidgway has deposited in this bank…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Officer v. OfficerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- McIntosh v. AubreySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Hunt v. HopleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Leach v. BeazleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Andrew v. Sac County State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kurth v. Van HornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Smolin v. First Fidelity Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Andrew v. Farmers & Merchants State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Jones v. PriceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
- Mobley v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.